Monday, September 8, 2014

Media and Culture: Chapter 14 Media Effects

Blog Graphic to emphasize points in entry.
http://mediatheorystudies.com/2013/02/27/gauntlett-the-media-effects/

Media effects the thoughts and actions of humans everyday. Some people are effected by it more than others. For several years researchers have studied and conducted tests/experiments in order to yield results that might explain how and why media effects culture.

Book used in class and cited in entry.
www.amazon.com 
Due to the common belief that media has a powerful effect on people, media researches focus on two types of research: cultural studies research and media effects research (Campbell). According to Media and Culture: An Introduction to Mass Communication, cultural studies focus on "how people make meaning, apprehend reality, articulate realities, and order experience through their use of cultural symbols". They also keen in on the way "status quo groups" use media to circulate their messages and sustain their interests. On the other hand, media effects research tries to "understand, explain, and predict the effects of mass media on individuals and society" (Campbell). Essentially the main objective is to reveal the connection between aggressive behavior and violence in the media, if any.

Walter Lippmann, a journalists that began to operate as a scientific researcher, gathering data and analyzing the material; he is commonly recognized for the rise of modern research methods. Research methods developed in the 1920's: propaganda analysis, public opinion research, social psychology studies, and marketing research. Through these research methods three popular theories of media effects developed.

First came the hypodermic-needle model. This method, also known as the "magic bullet" suggests that the media shoot their formidable effects directly into trusting targets like an injection. In other words, the powerful media could take full control of weak audiences that were susceptible to anything the media said.

The next method is called the minimal-effects model aka "the limited model". After several studies began to disprove the hypodermic-needle model having an affect on a larger population, scientists started discovering that some individuals engaged in selective exposure. This meant that media alone could not have a full affect on an individuals behaviors.

Media such as movies, video games, and television shows have been known to be the main causes of change and influence. Such media is meant to evoke different feelings, be it sadness, fear, anger, or even love. Violence and video games and movies have been on the forefront of conversations and studies about the effects they have on society, especially children. Children are easily swayed and influenced by what they see and hear. Commercials for toys are geared at children, even though they are not the ones buying the product. Video Games are created for game systems that are in the possession of minors, and although these games have age appropriate ratings, parents are still buying them.


Video Game Ratings
From: http://www.tower.com/games/esrb

1 comment:

  1. My view on the effect that media has on people is not too different than the one you present here and it may not be so profound but here it is. As I see it, media has two modes. The first one is to provide information on a particular subject and the second is to send a message. These modes are intended to produce either a "cultural' enhacement by expressing additional knowledge and/or an alteration on human behaviour.
    With the insertion of advanced technological tools, methods of delivery have definitely increased However, their uses have created an overabundance of information, which can be at times confusing and deceptive. It has created a challenge in general, for those seeking to inform as well as to those seeking to be informed.
    Throughout history, the use of "media", be it via public 'forums" (as in the Greek and Roman forums) or simply in letters written to communities (as in the Christian Apostle letters) has had a definitive message to produce an effect on psychological thought and human behaviour. In wars and "power" struggles, media has played a more radical role as a messenger of thought change in an individual as well as mass hipnosis to accept an action by one person or a group of persons.
    Last but not least, your three theories of media usage tells me that media is not by itself a producer of behaviour change but it is one of the factors. I ask then, how media can be best used to produce a positive effect on society in general.

    ReplyDelete